It seems like only sets 1, 2, and 3 are the only ones that get played

[ridiculed]

We've had the problem before but with map voting. When people are playing in game and voting comes up they're obviously going to spam 1, 2, or 3 because ot's closest to them. It's annoying having to play set 1, 2, and 3 all the time.

Implement the same map voting system to set voting so we don't always get the same 3 sets played.

[Lunacy]

http://forums.saxtonhell.com/index.php?topic=994.0 there seems to be a lot of topics on this concept
I still say, make vote:1 = Random

[VoiDeD]

Well as mentioned before, vote 1 being "Random Set" doesn't make much sense with the current set names.

Given that, we'd likely rename the sets to something like "Set A", "Set B", etc, and at that point we may as well apply some entirely random ordering to the vote.

[ridiculed]

den wuts da hold up

[Propane]

Remember when sets didn't exist? That was the best set.

[ridiculed]

shet dat was da best

dem set 1 hales where dabes.

[Propane]

If the random vote system does get implemented, then I'd suggest having those who don't vote at all automatically vote random.

[VoiDeD]

I'd like to get more insight into this issue. Do we need set votes in the first place? Perhaps we can simply change to a random set every map without a vote.

Bo made a poll on this, but it didn't get much attention so I'm going to create a new one shortly that I'd like everyone to vote on.

Done! Please vote  here.